Improving Surgical Patient Outcomes and Minimizing Risks With Opioid-sparing Pain Control
Modules within this online curriculum aim to prepare the surgeon and surgical team in screening high-risk patients for opioid misuse, , utilizing intraoperative alternatives to opioids and algorithms for surgical pain management in opioid-dependent patients,best discharge practices, patient education, and system quality improvements and changes. A skills component is forthcoming and complements the online didactic portion (with the complete set of modules to be posted by October 2019); individuals, practice groups, or hospital systems are able to obtain credentialing upon successful completion of both components in their entirety.
It is estimated that 312 million operations occurred globally in 2012 (Weiser, Haynes, Molina, et al., 2016) with 60 million procedures performed in the United States (Hall & DeFrances, 2010; Cullen & Hall, 2009). Additionally, an average of 6.2 percent of surgical patients continue to use opioids for 3 months following their operation (Brummett, Waljee, Goesling, et al., 2017). This potentially equates to 18 million people each year using opioids subsequent to their recovery period.
While there is an increased overall national awareness of the opioid epidemic with policy and education resources focused on professional training for chronic pain control, specific education for the surgical community—including professionals, patients, and families—are limited.
A 2017 American College of Surgeons (ACS) survey identified that:
- 87 percent of responding surgeons’ patients experienced side effects from opioids when taken for the management of postoperative pain, yet 82 percent of surgeons did NOT have print or other materials they could use to help educate their patients on opioid use, abuse, and alternatives (Heneghan, Daly, Sachdeva, & Barot, 2018).
- Multimodal pain control was identified as effective and 90 percent of surgeons reported using local anesthetics as part of their pain control plan.
- Equally important, 52 percent of surgeons stated their patient population had used opioids in the past month prior to their operation, yet only 17 percent had any protocol for managing patients who were opioid dependent (Heneghan, Daly, Sachdeva, & Barot, 2018).
In a 2018 course attended by 60 surgeon leaders responsible for implementing opioid-sparing system changes at their surgical facilities, 75 percent requested assistance from the ACS for further professional education on local anesthetic use for major surgical procedures (report summary given at ACS Clinical Congress 2018).
This course includes training and reinforcement on best practices and standards for surgical pain control.
Best Practices for Opioid-Sparing Techniques Including Indications, Modifications, Complications and Safety Monitoring
Phillip Lirk, MD
- Opioid-sparing Techniques
- Local Anesthetics
- Nerve Blocks
- Wound Infiltration
- Long-Acting Local Anesthetics
These courses can be taken by any member of the health care team or patient safety experts to support the didactic portion leading to the eventual credentialed training program on improving surgical patient outcomes and minimizing risks with opioid sparing pain control. Prime participants include:
- Physician assistants
- Home care providers
- Nurse aids
- Patient safety experts
Patient Education Materials
- Patient Education Safe Pain Control Brochure
A patient brochure that the surgeon and surgical team should review with their patient, prior to surgery.
- Patient Pain Control Evaluation
Have your patients submit feedback regarding their pain control following their surgery.
Available at: https://redcap.healthlnk.org/surveys/?s=PYT3EDJK79
In accordance with the ACCME Accreditation Criteria, the American College of Surgeons must ensure that anyone in a position to control the content of the educational activity (planners and speakers/authors/discussants/moderators) has disclosed all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. For additional information, please visit the ACCME website: http://www.accme.org/requirements/accreditation-requirements-cme-providers/policies-and-definitions/financial-relationships-and-conflicts-interest
The ACCME also requires that ACS manage any reported conflict and eliminate the potential for bias during the educational activity. Any conflicts noted below have been managed to our satisfaction. The disclosure information is intended to identify any commercial relationships and allow learners to form their own judgments. However, if you perceive a bias during a activity, please report it on the evaluation.
Faculty and Disclosures
Thomas A. Aloia, MD, FACS - No Disclosures
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chad Brummett, MD - No Disclosures
The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI
John Daly, MD, FACS, FRCSI (Hon), FRCSG (Hon) - No Disclosures
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health
Michael J. Englesbe, MD, FACS - No Disclosures
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI
Bridget Fahy, MD, FACS - No Disclosures
University of New Mexico
Jessica Lynn Gross, MD, FACS - No Disclosures
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Kathleen Heneghan, PhD, RN - No Disclosures
American College of Surgeons
Lawrence Iteld, MD - No Disclosures
Iteld Plastic Surgery
Phillip Lirk, MD - No Disclosures
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Lisa M. Mazzia, MD - No Disclosures
VA-National Center for Patient Safety
Ann Arbor, MI
Michael F. McGee, MD, FACS, FASCRS - No Disclosures
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Jonah Stulberg, MD, FACS - No Disclosures
Northwestern Memorial Hosptial
James B Ray, PharmD, CPE - No Disclosures
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa
Michael Reinhorn, MD, MBA, FACS - No Disclosures
Boston Hernai and Pilonidal Center
Scott Weiner, MD, MPH - No Disclosures
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
A Certificate of Completion will be awarded for this course.
This activity is not eligible for CME or CE credits.