CC2018: Why Continuous Certification?
Discussion of the pros and cons of continuous certification programs as administered by the American Board of Surgery and the American Board of Medical Specialties. This will include background information on continuous certification, discussion of its value to surgeons and patients, as well as principles of education and testing, controversies, and an update on legislative issues across the country.
- How Did We Get Here?
Mark A. Malangoni, MD, FACS, Philadelphia, PA
- Value of Continuous Certification to Surgeons
J. Patrick Walker, MD, FACS, Crockett, TX
- Value of Continuous Certification to Patients
Julie A. Freischlag, MD, FACS, Winston-Salem, NC
- Special Issues: Aging Surgeons
Ronald M. Stewart, MD, FACS, San Antonio, TX
- Principles of Education and Assessment
Karen J. Brasel, MD, FACS, Portland, OR
- Practicing surgeons
- Apply new knowledge and ideas to improve their surgical practice
- Adapt concepts and quality measures in support of research advancements
- Enhance the quality of patient care
- For questions about the course content, please contact email@example.com.
- If you have any technical questions, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
In accordance with the ACCME Accreditation Criteria, the American College of Surgeons must ensure that anyone in a position to control the content of the educational activity (planners and speakers/authors/discussants/moderators) has disclosed all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. For additional information, please visit the ACCME website: http://www.accme.org/requirements/accreditation-requirements-cme-providers/policies-and-definitions/financial-relationships-and-conflicts-interest
The ACCME also requires that ACS manage any reported conflict and eliminate the potential for bias during the educational activity. Any conflicts noted below have been managed to our satisfaction. The disclosure information is intended to identify any commercial relationships and allow learners to form their own judgments. However, if you perceive a bias during a activity, please report it on the evaluation.
(Download the full list of disclosures.)
Faculty and Disclosures
Mark A. Malangoni, MD, FACS, Philadelphia, PA - No Disclosures
J. Patrick Walker, MD, FACS, Crockett, TX - No Disclosures
Julie A. Freischlag, MD, FACS, Winston-Salem, NC - No Disclosures
Ronald M. Stewart, MD, FACS, San Antonio, TX - No Disclosures
Karen J. Brasel, MD, FACS, Portland, OR - No Disclosures
Program Committee and Disclosures
CHAIR: Henri R. Ford, MD, MHA, FACS, FAAP, FRCSEng(Hon), Miami, FL - No Disclosures
VICE-CHAIR: David T. Cooke, MD, FACS, Sacramento, CA - No Disclosures
David C. Borgstrom, MD, FACS, Morgantown, WV - No Disclosures
Daniel L. Dent, MD, FACS, San Antonio, TX - No Disclosures
Roger R. Dmochowski, MD, FACS, Nashville, TN - Allergen: Honoraria: Consultant
Audra A. Duncan, MD, FACS, London, ON - No Disclosures
Mariam F. Eskander, MD, Boston, MA - No Disclosures
Paula Ferrada, MD, FACS, Richmond, VA - No Disclosures
Neil H. Hyman, MD, FACS, Chicago, IL - No Disclosures
Martin S. Karpeh, Jr., MD, FACS, New York, NY - No Disclosures
Dennis H. Kraus, MD, FACS, New York, NY - No Disclosures
Kenneth W. Sharp, MD, FACS, Nashville, TN - No Disclosures
David A. Spain, MD, FACS, Stanford, CA - No Disclosures
Mary T. Hawn, MD, FACS, Stanford, CA - No Disclosures
Daniel M. Herron, MD, FACS, FASBMS, New York, NY - No Disclosures
Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS, FRCS(Hon), Houston, TX - No Disclosures
Quan-Yang Duh, MD, FACS, San Francisco, CA - No Disclosures
B. J. Hancock, MD, FACS, FRCSC, Winnipeg, MB - No Disclosures
Ronald V. Maier, MD, FACS, FRCSEd(Hon), Seattle, WA - No Disclosures
Valerie W. Rusch, MD, FACS, New York, NY - No Disclosures
Note: Residents will receive a Certificate of Completion.
- 1.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
- 1.50 Self Assessment Credit
- 1.50 Certificate of Completion